Home > All Infographics > A Comparison of Dedicated Servers By Company

A Comparison of Dedicated Servers By Company

Comments
Share

A Comparison of Dedicated Servers by Company

The tech industry’s major players require some serious firepower when it comes to servers. Here is a breakdown of how these giants stack up against each other. Who owns the most servers?

The company that owns the most servers is Google, with more than 1 million servers estimated. It is speculated that Google owns more than 2 percent of all the world’s servers.

Intel owns 100,000 servers. In terms of revenue, Intel is the world’s largest semiconductor chip maker.

1&1 Internet has 70,000 servers. It’s one of the world’s largest Web hosting services.

OVH has 65,000 servers. It’s the popular choice in Europe for budget Web hosting services.

Rackspace has 56,671 servers. The San Antonio based IT company specializes in service and support.

The Planet has 48,500 servers. It currently hosts over 15 million sites around the globe.

Facebook has 30,000 servers. The premier social networking site has over 350 million registered users.

SBC Comm. has 29,193 servers. The AT&T–owned company specializes in local wireless Internet service.

Verizon has 25,788 servers. The company provides telecommunications and broadband services.

Time Warner Cable has 24,817 servers. The cable company operates in 27 states.

Softlayer has 21,000 servers. The company provides hosting and on-demand media.

AT&T has 20,268 servers. The company is the largest phone provider in the U.S.

Peer1/Serverbeach has 10,277 servers. The company is a Web hosting provider built on the Peer1 network.

iWeb has 10,000 servers. iWeb is a website creation service that was developed by Apple.

Companies that don’t disclose their server numbers but that are estimated to have more than 50,000 include: Microsoft, eBay, HP/EDS, GoDaddy, Amazon, Yahoo and IBM.

related intac articles

related article
Why Smart Marketers Use Dedicated Server Web Hosting
related article
Is Dedicated Server Web Hosting Going the way of the Dodo?
related article
Build Your Own Server
  • jwilliams
    Rackspace stated in their 1st quarter financial filings to the SEC they have 59876 servers for comparison to some other companies you listed.
  • john finkle
    Weird that you left off Microsoft with well over 300k machines.
  • Andrea
    You should add NSA to the list of companies that don't disclose numbers (well, they don't disclose *anything*). I bet they would rank pretty well in the chart
  • maodan
    I wonder if you count some chinese company like tencent, baidu, taobao, etc.
  • jvassev
    @Kevin
    this is not 2dimensional representation of the data. Think about it: the space of every square is proportional to the number of servers
  • Joanna
    Your graph shows maybe 2.5% (being very generous here) of all the world's servers, assuming google owns 2% of the world's servers. Where's the other 97.5%?
    Looks like you're implying google has a monopoly on servers.
  • d3
    Why does intel need so many servers?
  • kevincovert
    if you filled them all up it would take 23810 racks... That is some serious AC!
  • cheesecake
    Google? Approx 3.5*10^6 cores.
  • jlandheer
    There's another big one missing. It starts with Micro....
  • Graphic Artist
    What a lousy way to present this information.
  • Vicent Roca
    And Facebook?
  • Layne Jaroux
    Nice work! Thought you'd be interested in seeing something I was forwarded: a stealth mode startup claiming to have hundreds of thousands of servers (!).

    According to the job posting, it would seem as if they deserve a pretty big piece of real estate on the chart. Not sure if this is right, though. If the likes of Intel only has 100,000 servers, what business does a startup have in having "hundreds of thousands of servers"?

  • TP Customer
    Floors....they'd occupy floors of space!
  • jisri
    I wonder how much power do they consume!
  • john
    At my university was a microsoft spokesman talking about Azure. He said, Microsoft was adding 10000 server per MONTH at the moment. Consindering the huge hotmail, bing and so on. They should come near to Google
  • engineer
    Facebook???
  • Nate
    What is the point of this infographic if the scale is ridiculously, obviously wrong?
  • Insane! but great
  • bandoine
    @kevin, area is a 1 dimensional value, more the graphic is juste about how Google owns more servers as all the other big informatic firm in the world and that's well done with this king of graph.
  • Intel? 100,000 servers? (Scratches head).
  • Nobody
    Why not? Take the number of servers as the square number and you can perfectly represent a 1 dim data in 2 dim...
  • Growler
    This is not to scale and is misleading because of it.
  • Adam
    The Conficker botnet owns the most "servers" on the planet
  • Giusepe
    pwned
  • dave
    What about microsoft?
  • Where the wikipedia
    Hey, where's the wikimedia?
  • msawired
    Correct, you have a scaling issue. Edward Tufte points this out many times in his books/articles. Although Intel has about twice the number of servers of Rackspace, this visualization is using area (2 dimensional!) to present that data, where the area Intel occupies is about 4 times the area that Rackspace occupies. This is what I would tweet as #visualizationfail!
  • Amazing facts. "It is speculated that Google owns more than 2 % of all the world´s servers". Does anyone have a quantity of this percent?
  • Carlos
    You also need to combine SBC and AT&T - Same company.
  • Makes you feel really small when you're just running 15 servers... :)
  • logicalchaostheory
    @shanesnow In terms of Google just search for a YouTube video on their data center container technology that they use. Each shipping container holds around 1,100 servers and each data center that I've seen houses around 10+ of these containers.
  • gagageage
    This is a mis-info-graph,

    as Kevin writes - it's not to scale, so the it's just a bunch of randomly sized boxes taking up space, and causing confusion, disappointment, and annoyance.

    Before a lot more comments point out the same thing, spend 5 minutes fixing this by making the proportions to scale, and update 'article'.

    You'll increase the number of readers too.

    Otherwise, this is going to win the worst 'info-graphic' ever!

    Tis a pity, because the idea you are trying to communicate is quite interesting/cool.
  • Kevin
    your infographic is not to scale. also, you're representing 1 dimensional data in 2 dimensions, which is not really useful. bar graph would be way better.
  • Dude, go back to your mom's basement.
  • bob
    how is that not useful? compare area instead of length, not too difficult. also, I feel like the point of this infographic is how incredible the number of Google servers is compared to the number of other people's, for which precision is not necessary.
  • Pingu
    lol, what a lousy comment ... As if it has anything to do with the insane fact that google have so many servers...

    A bar graph with all 100% will just show one high bar, with all the servers that isn't on this infographic.. Which will make google's 2% look tiny.. when in fact it is insane..
  • tom
    No Kevin, it's one to one - size is scalar. You can state size with a single number. You can state quantity with a single number. It's to scale.
  • Chris
    From what I gather, the data IS represented one dimensionally - as area.
  • e2k
    lolllllll poor sport
  • Toby
    I disagree. I think using a spatial dimension is a nice design choice. Otherwise it would just another boring bar chart. :)
  • tt
    Aight, Kevin, here's a bar graph:
    ---------- Google
    - The rest of the big boys
  • kevin - 1 dimensional data can easily be converted to 2 dimensional graphics like this, using percentages. what percent of the total number does Intel or Rackspace us? size the graphics by that percentage and you can have 2 dimensional data, easily
  • Toshiaki Shiki
    I'm not 12 or functionally retarded. If you just list the numbers in an easy to read format I can make my own conclusions. I don't need infographics that only serve to stroke the ego of some visual designer and hinder the relay of actual information.
  • shanesnow
    I wonder how much physical space all those servers would take up...
  • MogulMagnate
    I would be interested in capacity rather than number of servers
  • Wibble
    Assuming they are all 1U servers (they wont be) and they are filling up 42U racks in data centres (again unlikely) then 1000000/42 = 23810 racks Assuming also that these racks are 61cm wide by 106cm deep then in a single line could be 14.5 kilometres long.
blog comments powered by Disqus
JOIN BOX
SHARE BOX
Share this page with friends!
Yahoo